<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben&#039;s Blog &#187; #w2e</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benrapin.com/blog/tag/w2e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benrapin.com/blog</link>
	<description>Grandfather clocks, 60 minutes, waking before the sun comes up...this is my life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s the people, stupid&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/02/its-the-people-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/02/its-the-people-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#w2e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/02/its-the-people-stupid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great session: It&#8217;s the People, Stupid &#8211; New Marketing Paradigms in a Web 2.0 World
Brian Oberkirch (www.brianoberkirch.com), Deborah Schultz (www.deborahschultz.com) 
Again, I focused on the content and found a good summary
posted by someone who could type AND follow along&#8230;check that out here:
http://www.change-management-blog.com/2009/04/its-people-stupid-new-marketing.html
Thanks, Holger Nauheimer!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great session: It&#8217;s the People, Stupid &#8211; New Marketing Paradigms in a Web 2.0 World</p>
<p>Brian Oberkirch (www.brianoberkirch.com), Deborah Schultz (www.deborahschultz.com) </p>
<p>Again, I focused on the content and found a good summary<br />
posted by someone who could type AND follow along&#8230;check that out here:</p>
<p>http://www.change-management-blog.com/2009/04/its-people-stupid-new-marketing.html</p>
<p>Thanks, Holger Nauheimer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/02/its-the-people-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0 Expo &#8211; Why Social Media Marketing Fails</title>
		<link>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/01/web-20-expo-why-social-media-marketing-fails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/01/web-20-expo-why-social-media-marketing-fails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#w2e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/01/web-20-expo-why-social-media-marketing-fails/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to post my notes on this session for the folks back home but my notes FAIL in comparison to these:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/feeds/?p=887
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to post my notes on this session for the folks back home but my notes FAIL in comparison to these:</p>
<p>http://blogs.zdnet.com/feeds/?p=887</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/04/01/web-20-expo-why-social-media-marketing-fails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary of SEO Workshop</title>
		<link>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/03/31/summary-of-seo-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/03/31/summary-of-seo-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#w2e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benrapin.com/blog/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My summary / take away from the SEO workshop at the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I accidentally flew in to San Francisco a day early&#8230;  I ended up upgrading my conference package to include the workshops and the first session today was a 3 hour block on Search Engine Optimization by <a title="Stephan Spencer" href="http://www.stephanspencer.com/" target="_blank">Stephan Spencer</a> / <a title="Net Concepts" href="http://www.netconcepts.com/">Net Concepts</a>.  Great speaker and I took away a lot of good info &#8211; kind of blown away at the extent to which our site could change to be more SEO friendly.</p>
<p>Good takeaway in the first couple minutes: &#8220;A site without links pointing to is doesn&#8217;t deserve to rank&#8221;</p>
<p>SEM (Search Engine Marketing) vs SEO (Search Engine Optimization) &#8211; SEM covers SEO and adds to that paid placement (ppc), not to be taken as SEO is free &#8211; it is not.  Doing SEO correctly may necessitate the purchase of keyword tools, or vendors/contractors to assist.  Cheaper approach: If someone is doing it well &#8211; embrace and extend what they do.</p>
<p>86% of clicks on Google are from organic search results, only 14% are from paid search (based on eye tracking studies). However, people clicking on a paid ad are more likely to convert.    In either case, when someone is doing a search they are primed and ready to act so placement pays.  Clicks for the number one result are about 40% &#8211; this drops to 10% for the #2 result.  Ranking in multiple areas doesn&#8217;t hurt either &#8211; natural results, paid placement, image search, content network search, etc.</p>
<p>Yahoo is no longer the #2 search engine &#8211; more people now search via YouTube, which has moved into the #2 spot</p>
<p>Keywords &#8211; the word the CEO searches for each morning may not be the best (except for your job).  Pick the right keyword for your site, and speak your customer&#8217;s language.  Kitchen electronics is a common product category, but not what customers search for.  Baby products can attract more clicks via &#8220;baby names&#8221; than other keywords. Bottom line, keyword research is needed to identify what your market is searching for.  Tools: Quintura (Free) or Google Suggest / Keyword Tool / Trends / Insight.  Wordtracker is a paid tool, but based on less than 1% of the search market (dogpile and metacrawler users). Keyword Discovery is another paid service ($70/month), which shows historical trends and based on a larger user base. Advantage of Google tools is the large user base.  Check out Google Insight for Search, extends the data found in Google Trends &#8211; can see top rising search terms</p>
<p>Getting crawled doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re getting indexed.  Getting indexed doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re getting ranked.  Getting ranked doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re getting clicks and getting clicks doesn&#8217;t mean you will convert.</p>
<p>7 steps to ranking:<br />
•    Get your site fully indexed<br />
•    Get your pages Visible<br />
•    Build links and page rank<br />
•    leverage your page rank<br />
•    encourage click through<br />
•    track the RIGHT metrics<br />
•    follow best practices</p>
<p>Complexity can kill the crawl &#8211; Search engines are wary or dynamic pages (fear or spider traps)<br />
Avoid:<br />
•    stop characters (?&amp;=)<br />
•    session ids or long numerical strings that look like a session<br />
•    unnecessary variables<br />
•    frames<br />
•    redirects<br />
•    popups<br />
•    navigation in flash, java, javascript, pulldown boxes</p>
<p>Hurdles to indexing:<br />
complex / long urls that add no value to the page keywords<br />
content duplication<br />
non-canonicalization<br />
too many links and not high enough ranking (crawl equity) Higher Page rank at the top will allow more crawl equity for pages 10 clicks down.</p>
<p>Canonicalization: gvsu.edu/ should 301 redirect to www.gvsu.edu for all pages (no content duplication) same for / vs. index.htm.  Use server header checker to verify 301/302 redirects and use google google webmaster tools to enforce this or live http header firefox extension.</p>
<p>Key word prominence is so much better than keyword prominence.  Use a descriptive paragraph at the top of the page to introduce the rest of the page using important keywords.  Title tag is the most important copy on a page and the homepage is the most important. Don&#8217;t dilute the title with your brand name &#8211; stick with the content keywords.  Title tags and descriptive link text are will remain important SEO best practice.</p>
<p>Random things:<br />
•    <a title="seomoz.org" href="http://seomoz.org" target="_blank">seomoz.org</a> &#8211; link scape<br />
•    Get more links &#8211; link baiting.  Put out funny / useful content that others are baited into linking to &#8211; the SEO perspective of viral marketing<br />
•    use rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to tell google to not index certain links on your site (use this to give less importance to login pages, etc.)<br />
•    <a title="seobrowser.com" href="http://seobrowser.com" target="_blank">seobrowser.com</a> &#8211; tool for viewing a site as a crawler<br />
•    <a title="siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com" href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com</a> &#8211; check links into your site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benrapin.com/blog/2009/03/31/summary-of-seo-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

